Hot_Topic

Introducing Neil and the Hoaxers

Eric Dubay debunks Evolution

By the end of the reign of WHO Director-General Hiroshi Nakajima, he had been criticized for, quote, “autocratic style and poor management, his inability to communicate effectively, and, worst of all, cronyism and corruption” (Brown et al., 2006) and voluntary or “extrabudgetary” funds had already outpaced “assessed contributions” for the organization. Assessed contributions are funds submitted on the basis of a country’s wealth, its GNP and population, and are funds which the WHO assembly holds authority over. By contrast, voluntary or “extrabudgetary” contributions must be used as directed by the contributors, eff ectively selling out the WHO’s priorities to the highest bidder. I.e. quote, “Wealthy donor nations and multilateral agencies like the World Bank could largely call the shots on the use of the extrabudgetary funds they contributed” (Brown et al., 2006), causing “a great deal of dependence on the satisfaction of particular donors.” (Walt, 1993) Nakajima was replaced by Gro Harlem Brundtland. Brundtland had been well-placed as chairperson of the World Commission on Environment and Development at the time of the 1992 UN Conference on the Environment and Development (“Earth Summit”) in Rio de Janeiro, which saw the adoption of the UN’s Agenda 21, later updated and broadened to Agenda 2030 and its Sustainable Development Goals, as well as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change or UNFCCC, later famously extended with the Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement. The conference is credited as kicking off the trend of overt coziness between the UN and big business According to the Third World Network, “In 1998, Brundtland, newly elected as Director-General of WHO, told member states that one of the hallmarks of her term would also be increased cooperation with the private sector under the name of public-private partnerships.” As detailed in “The World Health Organization and the Transition From “International” to “Global” Public Health” by Brown et al., [Brundtland] began to strengthen WHO’s financial position, largely by organizing “global partnerships” and “global funds” to bring together “stakeholders”—private donors, governments, and bilateral and multilateral agencies—to concentrate on specific targets… These were semiautonomous programs bringing in substantial outside funding, often in the form of “public–private partnerships.” In 1999, Brundtland’s WHO drew up a document titled “Influenza Pandemic Plan: The Role of WHO and Guidelines for National and Regional Planning.” The British Medical Journal smelled a rat. revealing that, “In the small print of that document it states: “R Snacken, J Wood, L R Haaheim, A P Kendal, G J Ligthart, and D Lavanchy prepared this document for the World Health Organization (WHO), in collaboration with the European Scientific Working Group on Influenza (ESWI).” What this document does not disclose is that ESWI is funded entirely by Roche and other influenza drug manufacturers. Nor does it disclose that René Snacken and Daniel Lavanchy were participating in Roche sponsored events the previous year, according to marketing material seen by the BMJ/The Bureau.” The BMJ went on to identify several additional members of the European Scientific Working Group on Influenza in Roche’s marketing materials. That same year, the FDA would be offered new antivirals for pandemic preparedness called neuraminidase inhibitors by both Roche and the company that is now GlaxoSmithKline. When Dr. Elashoff, the statistician assigned to review both drugs, determined first that Glaxo’s drug lacked efficacy, and the FDA panel rejected the drug, the FDA overruled its panel and approved it. It then reassigned Roche’s drug to someone else, approving it shortly thereafter. (Cohen & Carter, 2010) In 2002, the WHO held a meeting of influenza experts for the use of vaccines and antivirals during an influenza pandemic. In 2004, the organization published a report from that meeting, “WHO Guidelines on the Use of Vaccines and Antivirals during Influenza Pandemics”, which had three annexes, all written by authors with relevant conflicts of interest that were not provided by the WHO. That the organization did not publicly disclose any of these conflicts of interest is particularly disturbing because governments around the world were advised based on the guidelines, which recommended stockpiling the drugs. In short order, 10 billion dollars were spent on Roche’s Tamiflu, and roughly 2 billion on GSK’s Relenza. The BMJ asked the WHO directly for the Declaration of Interest statements provided by participants, but was denied. Dr. Arnold Monto, exposed to have been paid by both Roche and GSK, was the lone author on the annex on pandemic vaccination, and was cited as substantiating the efficacy of neuraminidase inhibitors in the annex on antivirals despite that, per the BMJ’s expose, findings of such ostensible efficacy were profoundly difficult to replicate elsewhere. In fact, in a later collaboration with the highly respected Cochrane Review, the BMJ would leave such claims handily discredited, much to the embarrassment of the WHO, which had already placed Tamiflu on its list of “essential medicines”. (Kelland, 2010) Dr. Monto would later become fairly well-known to Americans tuning in to the FDA’s VRBPAC meetings in the COVID era, as a result of the fact that, in addition to being a voting panelist, he was the one who led them. From the perspective of the biopharmaceutical industry that underwrites three quarters of the FDA’s review budget (Chen, 2018), Monto did not disappoint. For example, on June 28, 2022 when Dr. Ofer Levy asked Pfizer’s science VP whether her meager eight-mouse antibody data (Mole, 2022) had any correlates of protection, Monto was there to rush the answer, appearing completely undeterred by her admission that there were “no correlates of protection”. (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022) He then falsely proclaimed to the panel “we have to pick one” of the shot formulations, implying that no paucity of data would lead him to rejection (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2022). The apparent preordination was so shameful that one of the FDA’s most avidly pro-vaccine panelists ceded in a subsequent interview that he felt “the fix was in.” (ZDoggMD, 2022) Returning to the chronicle, 2005 was a landmark year in the pandemic preparedness sequence. There was the Avian flu scare, for which Dr. David Nabarro, one of the most senior and prominent public health experts at the World Health Organization, told the BBC that the "range of deaths could be anything between five and 150 million.” (Sturcke, 2005) Of course, nothing remotely close to those figures occurred, nor was it ever reasonably inferable. Ontario's former chief medical officer went so far as to decry the rhetoric as “fraud”. (Andresen, 2006) This did not stop the Bush administration from vying to spend 7 billion dollars (Tucker, 2020) on the panic, nor Donald Rumsfeld from making a “killing” (Lean & Owen, 2006) from Tamiflu profits allotted to Gilead sciences, which had developed the drug for Roche. Rumsfeld had been on the board of Gilead before joining the Bush administration, a company that became better known in the COVID era for developing remdesivir, a drug which was recommended for COVID treatment in the United States by a panel with 9 members receiving financial support from the company (NIH, 2023) following a last-minute change in the primary endpoint of its NIAID trial, detailed in the Washington Post. “I think that they thought they weren’t going to win, and they wanted to change it to something they could win on,'' said Steven Nissen, a Cleveland Clinic cardiologist and expert clinical investigator who has led numerous drug trials. …Gilead did not respond to a question about whether it had input on the decision to change the endpoint. The obscenely lucrative drug (Maybarduk, 2020), notable for its tendency to precipitate kidney failure (Gérard et al., 2021), took on preeminent status in federal recommendations (NIH, 2023), becoming widely used in hospitals across the US (McCarver, 2021), which, perhaps not entirely coincidentally, had the highest death rate in the developed world (including in 2020, before things like varying vaccination rates could have been fingered for the discrepancy). (Cortez, 2020) Later studies suggested the drug actually increased the length of hospital stays rather than reducing them. (McCarver, 2021) Most crucially, 2005 was the year the World Health Organization came out with its updated version of the International Health Regulations. The WHO had drafted the original International Health Regulations (IHR) in 1969, which themselves represented a “revised and consolidated version of the previous International Sanitary Regulations.” (PAHO) The 2005 revision was designed to comparatively increase the legislative and constitutional power of the WHO. Among other things, the 2005 IHR empowered the WHO Director-General to declare Public Health Emergencies of International concern, or PHEICs. The 2005 International Health Regulations officially went into force in the summer 2007, in near-simultaneity with the establishment of advanced supply contracts for pandemic-specific vaccines with drugmakers, referred to in British parliament as “sleeping contracts”. (Hansard, 2007) The WHO was almost ready to declare its first Public Health Emergency of International concern. from --- Sources/Links: https://veryofficialnews.substack.com/p/who-history?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470434/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10126754/ https://sdgs.un.org/goals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Framework_Convention_on_Climate_Change https://www.twn.my/title2/resurgence/2015/298-299/cover02.htm https://www.corpwatch.org/article/greenwash-10#rio https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/340/7759/Feature.full.pdf https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/70631/WHO_CDS_CSR_RMD_2004.8_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y https://www.reuters.com/article/us-roche-hldg-tamiflu/researchers-regulators-and-roche-row-over-stockpiled-drug-tamiflu-idUSBREA3824K20140409/ https://www.propublica.org/article/fda-repays-industry-by-rushing-risky-drugs-to-market#:~:text=As%20pharma%20companies%20underwrite%20three,effects%20and%20unproven%20health%20benefits. https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/08/with-data-in-mice-pfizer-asks-fda-to-authorize-its-fall-ba-4-5-booster-shot/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFdzNUus_CE&t=11104s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFdzNUus_CE&t=14014s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLo2Wwa3NNA https://www.theguardian.com/world/2005/sep/30/birdflu.jamessturcke https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1534081/ https://www.aier.org/article/a-retrospective-on-the-avian-flu-scare-of-2005/ https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-rumsfeld-makes-5m-killing-on-bird-flu-drug-6106843.html?r=14042 https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/about-the-guidelines/panel-financial-disclosure/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/05/01/government-researchers-changed-metric-measure-coronavirus-drug-remdesivir-during-clinical-trial/ https://www.citizen.org/news/gileads-remdesivir-price-is-offensive/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33340409/ https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/antivirals-including-antibody-products/remdesivir/ https://medicine.uiowa.edu/content/research-shows-remdesivir-treatment-covid-19-has-little-impact-survival-increases-hospital https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/emsworld/news/1225033/us-has-highest-covid-19-death-rate-developed-world https://www.paho.org/en/documents/international-health-regulations-1969 https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2007-10-09/debates/0710106000132/VaccinesSleepingContracts

Eric Dubay Exposes the Evolution Hoax

Almost all Science is Science Fiction

"The media and I have fostered a close relationship." -Margaret Chan In April of 2009, the WHO declared its first-ever Public Health Emergency of International Concern following the CDC’s reportage of two infections with “new influenza A H1N1” on April 18, and detection of two more on the 23rd. (CDC Archive) On April 27, the WHO “raised the level of influenza pandemic alert from phase 3 to phase 4, based on data showing person-to-person spread and the ability of the virus to cause community-level outbreaks”. Then on April 29 again raised it the level from phase 4 to phase 5, “signaling that a pandemic was imminent, and requested all countries to immediately activate their pandemic preparedness plans and be on high alert for unusual outbreaks of influenza-like illness and severe pneumonia.” "All countries should immediately activate their pandemic preparedness plans," reported then Director-General Margaret Chan (Grady, 2009). "This change to a higher phase of alert is a signal to governments, to ministries of health and other ministries, to the pharmaceutical industry and the business community that certain actions should now be undertaken with increased urgency, and at an accelerated pace.” (VOA, 2009) A CNN reporter contacted the WHO, and pointed out that the definition on the World Health Organization’s website stated that a pandemic flu causes "enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” (Cohen, 2009) This was not evidenced to be the case at the time. That morning, prior to the call, the text indeed described an influenza pandemic as a scenario in which a lack of immunity resulted in “epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness” (Web Archive, 2009) Shortly thereafter, the entire section was replaced with one labelled “Introduction” with no such reference. (Web Archive, 2009) Two days later, a new definition of influenza pandemic was presented with the requirement of “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” conspicuously absent. It further asserted that “pandemics can be either mild or severe”. (Web Archive, 2009) Succinctly, with no remaining requirement for severity, an “influenza pandemic” could mean just about whatever the WHO wanted. On June 11, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic and raised the worldwide pandemic alert level to phase 6. Dr Klaus Stoehr, formerly in charge of WHO's pandemic preparedness, later stated, "The pandemic planning I was involved with was always based on a severe public health event. [...] Moving to Phase 6 meant that we wanted governments [...] to kick in their plans whether they thought it was urgent or not". (Social Health and Family Affairs Committee, 2010) And yet, that year’s swine flu proved no more severe in terms of complications than standard seasonal flu. Further still, only about half as many people died of flu-classified illness as in a typical year. (Randall, 2010) Moreover, the WHO’s declaration came as a consequence of advisement Chan received from the WHO’s pandemic Emergency Committee, whose membership the WHO insisted on keeping secret, contrary to precedent. (Cohen & Carter, 2010) Despite the WHO’s lack of cooperation, the BMJ managed to use peripheral sources to confirm the participation of three of the committee members, including none other than Arnold Monto, aforementioned pharmaceutical-paid author of the vaccination annex. [Pharmacology and Therapeutics] Professor Mintzes does not agree with WHO’s explanation that secrecy was needed to protect against the influence of outside interest on decision making. “I can’t understand why the WHO kept this secret. It should be public in terms of accountability like the expert advisory committees.” … She also believes that the very nature of allowing a trigger point for vaccine contracts opens the system up unnecessarily to exploitation. “It seems a problem that this declaration might trigger contracts to be realised. There should be safeguards in place to make sure those with an interest in vaccine manufacturers can’t exploit the situation.“ Smarting from the BMJ’s damning exposé, the World Health Organization would deign to release the identities of its committee members roughly a month later. (Healio, 2010) Of the sixteen members, half a dozen of them declared competing interests, including one Professor Neil M. Ferguson, who admitted to having consulted for Roche, Novartis and GSK Biologicals. (WHO, 2010) Notably, having spent a career making precisely the kind of worst-case-scenario conjectures (Fund, 2020) most lucrative for the pharmaceutical industry, Neil “Professor Lockdown” Ferguson (Patel, 2021) would more or less single-handedly set the tone for the British and American COVID response (Kelland & Piper, 2020) with modeling that was empirically demonstrated to be an absurd farce by the countries that bucked his lockdown recommendations. (Magness, 2021) Even more scandalously, Ferguson infamously broke the very lockdown rules he pushed Boris Johnson to impose so as to rendezvous with his married lover (Tucker, 2020). Ferguson resigned due to the outrage, but, amazingly, would be brought back onto the government’s advisory board in time to cancel Christmas for fellow Brits. (Norton, 2020)1 While the occasional embarrassing COVID-era revelation of the hypocrisy of public officials was tolerated at some outlets, it is notable that during the 2009 H1N1 fiasco some of the press was still willing to engage in outright policy criticism as well., This preceded COVID-era innovations like billion-dollar COVID vaccine promotion payoffs from government to mainstream media (WION, 2022). But with H1N1 Forbes, for example, published an article on the sordid affair bluntly titled, “Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic”. The article was quietly unpublished during the COVID era, but remains available on the web archive. (Web Archive, 2010) The Daily Mail wrote, “The pandemic that never was: Drug firms 'encouraged world health body to exaggerate swine flu threat’" (Macrae, 2010) Lamenting the unscrupulous hype, the Guardian’s Simon Jenkins wrote, “When the current scare is over and the bill tallied, surely there should be an inquiry into this fiasco. Otherwise Voltaire was right. We should take out a virologist from time to time and shoot him, to encourage the others. And ¬perhaps an editor too.” The Irish Times was slightly more diplomatic: Some sceptics say a group with strong connections in Geneva had a strong interest in phase six being declared: the drugs industry. Once a pandemic was declared, sleeping contracts to supply millions of vaccines to dozens of governments around the world would automatically come into force. "Sometimes you get the feeling that there is a whole industry almost waiting for a pandemic to occur," Tom Jefferson of the Cochrane Collaboration, an international non-profit organisation, told German news magazine Der Spiegel recently. Ireland also took the lead in revealing the hardship suffered by those afflicted with narcolepsy from Pandemrix, GSK’s rushed vaccine for the ordeal, with both the Irish Times, and RTÉ News, Ireland’s largest news source, courageously covering the heartrending fallout. The debilitating narcolepsy caused in young people across Europe as a result of the rushed drug is now officially acknowledged (Vogel, 2015), but the fight to gain acknowledgement of their injuries, led by beleaguered Finnish neurologist Markku Partinen, was bare-knuckled and badly refereed. At a Finnish medical convention in January 2011, a colleague approached neurologist Markku Partinen, laid a hand on his shoulder and said: “Markku, it’s going to be a bad year for you.” In the following months, other scientists ridiculed him, questioned his methods and motives, and raised doubts about his mental stability. Colleagues began crossing the street to avoid him, he says. Neither the Lancet nor the New England Journal of Medicine would publish Partinen’s work, nor, after the tide turned, were they wiling to comment on their editorial decisions. (Kelland, 2013) Despite the costs and injuriousness, not everyone was critical of the World Health Organization. Epidemiologist Mike Osterholm was quoted by CTV news declaring, “I think that they were completely above board on this.” Another COVID reappearance, Osterholm is better known today for his role as a major White House COVID advisor (Wiki Archived 2023), particularly zealous in his advocacy of COVID vaccination for children, insisting to parents that the just-released, long term-untested protein synthesis-commandeering vaccines were “safer than aspirin”. (Wurzer et al., 2021) Whatever one’s perspective on policy, all told, the 2009 H1N1 ordeal appears to have represented something approaching an 18 billion dollar windfall for industry. (Wodarg, 2010) Of course, this was a fraction of what would be made by Pfizer (Kimball, 2023) or even Moderna (Wingrove & Leroy, 2023) in the COVID era, but it nonetheless served as an impressive proof-of-concept of the kind of revenue frantic one-size-fits-all medical policies could generate, with no negative consequences for industry. from ... Sources/Links: https://veryofficialnews.substack.com/p/first-pheic?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2 https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic-resources/2009-pandemic-timeline.html https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/30/health/30flu.html#:~:text=%E2%80%9CAll%20countries%20should%20immediately%20activate,like%20illness%20and%20severe%20pneumonia.%E2%80%9D https://www.voanews.com/a/a-13-2009-04-29-voa61-68733927/409978.html http://edition.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/05/04/swine.flu.pandemic/index.html WHO changing definition of Influenza pandemic: http://web.archive.org/web/20090504005605/www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic/en/ http://web.archive.org/web/20090504205839/www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic/en/ http://web.archive.org/web/20090506005107/www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/pandemic/en/ https://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2010/20100604_H1n1pandemic_E.pdf https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-09-07/swine-flu-in-children-is-no-more-severe-than-seasonal-virus-study-finds https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/340/7759/Feature.full.pdf https://www.healio.com/news/pediatrics/20120331/who-reveals-names-of-h1n1-emergency-committee https://www.who.int/groups/h1n1-ihr-emergency-committee https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/professor-lockdown-modeler-resigns-in-disgrace/ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10347239/Neil-Ferguson-admits-doomsday-predictions-oversimplified.html http://web.archive.org/web/20200317121447/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-britain-research/sobering-coronavirus-study-prompted-britain-to-toughen-its-approach-idUSKBN2141EP https://www.aier.org/article/the-failure-of-imperial-college-modeling-is-far-worse-than-we-knew/ https://www.thedailybeast.com/neil-ferguson-uk-professor-who-spearheaded-national-lockdown-quits-after-meeting-lover-antonia-staats https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9073767/Professor-Neil-Ferguson-key-role-Boris-Johnsons-dramatic-U-turn-Christmas.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sifGuMTNzhs http://web.archive.org/web/20100208182828/https://www.forbes.com/2010/02/05/world-health-organization-swine-flu-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/may/05/swine-flu-panic https://www.irishtimes.com/news/swine-flu-pandemic-or-manipulated-panic-1.650611 https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/people/this-is-the-world-of-narcolepsy-1.1733649 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfl22yQHYXA https://www.science.org/content/article/why-pandemic-flu-shot-caused-narcolepsy https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE92K067/ https://www.ctvnews.ca/journal-says-who-flu-advisers-had-conflict-of-interest-1.519128 https://web.archive.org/web/20230530122619/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Osterholm https://www.mprnews.org/story/2021/09/01/osterholm-on-the-fourth-covid19-wave-schools-reopening-vaccine-safety https://archive.is/CYW5n https://www.cnbc.com/2023/01/31/the-covid-pandemic-drives-pfizers-2022-revenue-to-a-record-100-billion.html#:~:text=The%20Covid%20pandemic%20drives%20Pfizer%27s%202022%20revenue%20to%20a%20record%20%24100%20billion,-Published%20Tue%2C%20Jan&text=Pfizer%20sold%20%2437.8%20billion%20of,demand%20for%20the%20shots%20slowed. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/moderna-beats-covid-vaccine-sales-expectations-deferred-revenue-rolls-2023-05-04/

Biblical Cosmology Documentary The Truth is Stranger than Fiction

DNA at risk – mRNA vaccines extremely dangerous! New article by Prof Bhakdi, Prof Reiss and Dr. Palmer with a report from a vaccine victim [Lara:] \„Three days after the third coronavirus vaccination on 17 January 2022, I fainted and when I came back, I was completely confused and my legs could no longer hold me up. I just couldn’t walk anymore.’\ [Bhakdi: \"Weeks and even months after the injections, the vaccinated were found to have spike protein and inflammation in many organs, leading to severe and often fatal illnesses. But how could one explain this unexpected sustained production of an mRNA-encoded protein?”\ Kla.TV published Prof Dr Sucharit Bhakdi’s warning letter on the ‘never-ending dangers of RNA vaccines’ in several languages at the end of 2023. Now Prof Dr Sucharit Bhakdi, together with Prof Karina Reiss and Dr. Michael Palmer, has published an article at the end of March 2024 in which new findings confirm all the warnings made at the time. They explain why so-called mRNA vaccines are fraudulent and extremely dangerous in a scientifically precise but understandable way for the layperson. This well-founded article is ideal for passing on to anyone who has not yet familiarized themselves with this topic. It is available as a printable PDF below this broadcast. Afterwards Prof Bhakdi is recording the article for you. A subsequent report by Lara shows the dramatic effects that the correlations described by Prof Bhakdi can have for those already affected. She is one of countless corona vaccine victims and tells her story of suffering as part of the MWGFD press symposium ‘Vaccinated, damaged, denied ... and now?’. Many thanks to Schnute TV for the following recording with Prof Bhakdi! Vaccine-injured Lara: \"Hello, my name is Lara and I’m going to tell you my story today.... My name is Lara and I turned twenty a month ago. My name is Lara, I‘m twenty and 2 weeks before my 18th birthday I was suddenly unable to walk. Three days after the third corona vaccination on 17 January 2022, I fainted and when I came back to myself, I was completely confused and my legs couldn’t hold me up anymore. I just couldn’t walk anymore. I won’t forget that date. After an hour, I also had difficulty breathing and was taken to the children’s hospital. My condition didn’t change much in the time that followed. Even my hands couldn’t grasp objects properly. I spent my days in bed. I couldn’t read because by the third word in a sentence I had already forgotten the first two words... Music and videos kept me company. Incontinence came on top of that, I didn’t even know the word. I was in bed for ten months. I had just turned eighteen. For me, that would have been the time to go out, to meet friends, to be free. But I was tied to a bed. Friends left one after the other. On the one hand, it was a great pain for me, but on the other, what can you do with someone who is only acting crazy! I can’t explain the whole way of the cross. It would go beyond this time frame. I will describe it in note-form. Acupuncture got me back on my feet. I have to repeat the school year. I manage two short trips, Paris and Rome. Hooray! But September 2022 ... A leaden fatigue sets in. Relapses start. Can’t walk again. I try to repeat the class, but I can’t. Change of school type, okay. No more A-level school. But the change is good. I get crutches so that I can go to school even on the bad days. The time of recurring so-called relapses begins. The crutches no longer help me because I’ve become too tired for them. I have to accept what I never wanted: the wheelchair. But I can go to school. Then I lived in a kind of relapse rhythm. I have since learnt to live with these relapses Since that day in January 2022, my life has become like a rollercoaster: Relapse, break, half relapse, break, severe relapse, break. It’s not easy. But I can do it. I want to make it. I have a lot of dreams. During these two years, I have been particularly preoccupied with something that may seem unimportant. I didn’t know what kind of sickness I had. Nobody knew. I remember the day my mum found out on the internet that my nameless illness had a name after all: post-vac syndrome. Now I can laugh about it. Because that’s not actually a disease name. But I was happy. Now I know why it was so important to me. Because someone had suddenly seen me. And my condition had a name. Because I shared my illness with others. I was no longer alone. And it was liberating. After many examinations, where I was always told ‘everything is normal’, I now finally have two diagnoses: small fibre neuropathy and fatigue syndrome. I haven’t just had bad medical experiences on this long journey. A few doctors were decisive. They helped me a little further and I thank them from the bottom of my heart. I'm still on the rollercoaster. It’s not over. But it’s flattening now. I hope it stays that way. And I hope I can get off this rollercoaster completely at some point. It would be nice to stand on the ground with functional legs. Keep researching! We all need a perspective. And I need you. Thank you.’\ The association MWGFD has conducted further impressive and moving interviews with mRNA vaccine victims in the series ‘Vaccinated, damaged, denied’. You can find them under the link on the screen. In view of the fact that mRNA technology is also to be introduced for other vaccinations – or more accurately, gene therapies – it is all the more important to publicize these dramatic reports of vaccine damage. Please spread the word about these interviews. You can also help to make the extent of damage caused by mRNA vaccinations visible by entering vaccine injuries from your environment at vetopedia.org. from ts. Sources/Links: Watch out: Sucharit has disturbing news | RKI protocols https://odysee.com/@ZeigSchnute:9/Dr.-Bhakdi-Interview:e?r=Dn48yfochYfy2qR56fw6vUgY3Cs7gBLn Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, Prof. Karina Reiss und Dr. Michael Palmer: Why RNA vaccines are fraudulent and extremely dangerous Artikel als PDF im blauen Kasten unter der Sendung als Download verfügbar MWGFD: Press symposium: vaccinated, damaged, denied ... and now? Erfahrungsbericht von Lara und weiteren https://odysee.com/@MWGFD:0/20240316psmwgfd:0 MWGFD-Interviewreihe: „Vaccinated, damaged, denied“ https://youtu.be/tLZOuuMr24s?si=6EJwDbgaq5yza-ZX Vetopedia Record vaccination damage here: https://vetopedia.org/impfschaden Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, Prof. Karina Reiss und Dr. Michael Palmer: Why RNA vaccines are fraudulent and extremely dangerous Artikel als PDF im blauen Kasten unter der Sendung als Download verfügbar 1. Food and Drug Administration (2020) FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download 2. Food and Drug Administration (2020) FDA briefing document: Moderna MRNA-1273. https://www.fda.gov/media/144452/download 3. European Medicines Agency (2021) Assessment report: Comirnaty. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/comirnaty-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf 4. European Medicines Agency (2021) Assessment report: COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf 5. Morz, M. (2022) A Case Report: Multifocal Necrotizing Encephalitis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against Covid-19. Vaccines 10:2022060308 https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651 6. Morz, M. (2022) A Case Report: Acute Myocardial Infarction, Coronal Arteritis and Myocarditis after BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination against Covid-19. Preprints DOI:10.20944/preprints202209.0051.v1 https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202209.0051/v1 7. Palmer, M. und Bhakdi, S. (2022) Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality. https://doctors4covidethics.org/vascular-and-organ-damage-induced-by-mrna-vaccines-irrefutable-proof-of-causality/ 8. McKernan, K. et al. (2023) Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose. https://osf.io/preprints/osf/b9t7m 9. Josephson, F. et al. (2020) EMA Rapporteur Rolling Review critical assessment report. 10. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (1998) WHO Technical Report Series No. 878. https://archive.org/details/EmaRolling 11. McKernan, K. (2023) Pfizer and Moderna bivalent vaccines contain 20-35% expression vector and are transformation competent in E.coli. https://anandamide.substack.com/p/pfizer-and-moderna-bivalent-vaccines 12. Miao, C.H. et al. (2001) Long-term and therapeutic-level hepatic gene expression of human factor IX after naked plasmid transfer in vivo. Mol. Ther. 3:947-57 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11407909/ 13. McKernan, K. (2024) Vaccine targeted qPCR of Cancer Cell Lines treated with BNT162b2. https://anandamide.substack.com/p/vaccine-targeted-qpcr-of-cancer-cell 14. Rancourt, D. et al. (2023) Age-stratified COVID-19 vaccine-dose fatality rate for Israel and Australia. https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=126 15. Rancourt, D. et al. (2023) COVID-19 vaccine-associated mortality in the Southern Hemisphere. https://correlation-canada.org/covid-19-vaccine-associated-mortality-in-the-southern-hemisphere/ 16. Palmer, M. et al. (2023) mRNA Vaccine Toxicity. https://doctors4covidethics.org/mrna-vaccine-toxicity/

Players state there are many Flat Earthers on Major League Baseball Teams

"Strong leadership is essential in the face of health crises" -Tedros Ghebreyesus Per the WHO, “On 31 December 2019, the WHO China Country Office was informed of cases of pneumonia of unknown etiology (unknown cause) detected in Wuhan City, Hubei Province of China.”1 Two weeks later, the organization published a paper titled “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR”2 to its website. This paper was non-peer-reviewed and its authorship had massive undisclosed conflicts of interest. It was later fiercely critiqued by a slew of preeminent scientists.3 For better or worse, the paper would serve as the primary basis for the notoriously irregular PCR testing of the subsequent fiasco. Over the coming weeks, Tedros would repeatedly praise China for “the transparency they have demonstrated”4 and their “commitment” thereto, which Tedros said to be “very impressive, and beyond words” in his January 30th Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) declaration.5 Most notably, in his initial speech declaring a PHEIC, Tedros would single-handedly set the tone for the pandemic response by praising China for its “extraordinary measures”.9 At that time, footage was already circulating of Chinese citizens being welded into their apartments,10 a practice that would continue in the coming months,11 aided by Tedros’s staunch reaffirmations.12 The ensuing promotion of the shutdown of entire economies manned and frequented almost entirely by people under the age of 70 for an illness classification that was statistically a threat only to those above it has been said likely to be “the biggest policy mistake in modern times.”13 Tedros would grandstand as an advocate for poor countries, largely ignoring the global ramifications he was, in theory, supposed to care about, such as that no less than 150 million additional children were plunged into poverty as a result of pandemic measures,14 dying at a rate of roughly a quarter million biannually from the consequent hunger alone, according to UN reporting.15 As for broader effects, another report from Unicef found that same number, a quarter million, died as a result of the lockdowns in just half a dozen South Asian countries in 2020 alone.16 The fight against tuberculosis, the global overall deadliest infectious disease17, was set back a dozen years.18 Similar setbacks had occurred in the domains of malaria (which witnessed an additional 13 million infections19), nutrition-related diseases20, child marriages21 (which doubled22), and child labor worldwide.23 In terms of the cost in life years, a measure of the amount of time relative to life expectancy that is lost, none of these policies were rational for the first world either, as a multitude of studies have demonstrated.24, 25, 26, 27 …cost-benefit analysis of the response to COVID-19 finds that lockdowns are far more harmful to public health (at least 5–10 times so in terms of wellbeing years) than COVID-19 can be.28 Even in the short term, the rate of death from all causes for younger adults rose by a bigger percentage than the rate of death from all causes for the elderly, first proven by NBER29, and verified by the New York Times.30 The Times’s acknowledgement was not trivial. Just one year prior, the paper had evangelized pandemic measures to the point of publishing an article titled, “Actually, Wearing a Mask Can Help Your Child Learn” by psychologist Judith Danovitch.31 A few months after the harrowing NBER study, however, national testing data was released.32 The Times put out a somber article titled, “The Pandemic Erased Two Decades of Progress in Math and Reading.”33 The issues for young children were not merely academic. Per the CDC, roughly 30 percent of students said one of the adults at home lost their job.34 A record 420,000 children a month in England were treated for mental health problems,35 and in the United States, the suicide attempt rate among teenage girls jumped 51%.36 MIT found an increase in youth suicides carried out in 202037 and the CDC found a substantial increase in 2021 for young adults, especially in 15 to 24 year old males.38 State-by-state analyses repeatedly showed that lockdown policies didn’t work even for their intended short-term purpose of reducing COVID deaths.39, 40, 41, 42 Even if they had, they would have still produced “more harm to children in exchange for less harm to adults” as the Time’s David Leonhardt ceded43, which in virtually all circumstances is wrong on its face. Moreover, this publication is not aware of a single survey in which the typical COVID victims, statistically elderly and moribund, were polled demanding for young people to make sacrifices on their behalf.44 Thousands of medical and public health scientists45, including some of the world’s most distinguished immunologists,46 were censored in Google’s search results and on other platforms for attempting to raise just this issue so as to advocate for a more nuanced approach.47, 48, 49 This censorship, too, had roots in WHO statements from the earliest days of the pandemic. Already in his initial PHEIC declaration, Tedros called for “combat[ting] the spread of rumours and misinformation.”50 He would double down strongly on this rhetoric in short order, using the term “infodemic” as early as February 2020. This sort of equation of speech with disease served as a rallying cry for an unprecedented wave of censorship going forward.51 By April 2020, Youtube’s CEO Susan Wojcick announced that “Anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy.”52 The WHO subsequently bragged that close to a million (850,000) videos were removed from from February 2020 to January 2021 alone as a result of WHO-crafted misinformation policy.53 (More broadly, WHO claims to work with “YouTube, Google, Facebook and several other partners” on a weekly basis to identify and target misinformation.) Those who assume that whatever was censored must have been flagrantly wrong are mistaken. Tech company policies included “reducing the virality of content discouraging vaccines that does not contain actionable misinformation.” More specifically, this consisted of “often-true content” that “can be framed as sensation, alarmist, or shocking.”54, 55, 56 None other than the British Medical Journal, one of the oldest and most prestigious peer-reviewed journals in the world, was censored for revealing data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial.57 Even photo-sharing platform Instagram got in on the action, censoring the hashtag #naturalimmunity58. This, too, was directly reflective of WHO policy. Reminiscent of its antics leading up to 2009 H1N1, late in 2020, the WHO would go about changing its definition of herd immunity, previously, “when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection”59 to “a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it.”60 Just as absurd as changing what was supposed to be a scientific definition to one of policy-promotion was the policy itself; that of pursuing herd immunity with overtly non-sterilizing vaccines, especially given that herd immunity had never been achieved via vaccination for any cold, flu, nor analogous respiratory infection61, and certainly not for any coronavirus, for which there’d been no prior vaccine, period.62 Moreover, transmission prevention was not even tested in the trials.63, 64, 65, 66 As a general rule of thumb, pharmaceutical companies are unlikely to reach standards they’re not held to. Of course, none of this mattered. The WHO knew that vaccines were the answer. In 2020, as some governments floated the idea of immunity passports, which would affirm the status of those who had had previous infection so as to allow them greater mobility in the face of increasing restrictions, the WHO shut it down, asserting that there was not enough evidence to support a pass based on natural immunity.67 By stark contrast, that same year, the organization was already working with countries to develop digital vaccine certificates for vaccines that hadn’t even been released yet.68 The idea, spearheaded by Mr. Gates, that, “you don't have a choice… normalcy only returns when we've largely vaccinated the entire global population,” reached a sort of religious fervor amongst officials.69 Even after it became clear in the summer of 2021 from data out of countries with nearly all adults vaccinated such as Israel70 and Iceland71, 72 that vaccinated herd immunity was not tenable, countries (including the US) still pushed for mandates. (Iceland, an island nation, even at its most lax, had only allowed entry with proof of vaccination or previous infection. It was as clear-cut a real-world experiment for which one could hope.)73 The CDC’s own data at the time74 showed the vaccines were not preventing against infection, something White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Deborah Birx later admitted she knew would be the case from the beginning.75, 76 Some attempted ex post facto justifying mandates based on the idea that the unvaccinated would “overwhelm” hospitals77, but save for the elderly, who had virtually all already been vaccinated, this was largely a non-sequitur; working age people were never at a significant risk of hospitalization. From the get-go, at his initial January 2020 PHEIC declaration, Tedros set the tone for the headlong attitude undergirding Project Warp Speed and similar programs, being one of the first to call for countries to “accelerate the development of vaccines” without issuing a world of caution about safety.78 This attitude had harrowing precedents. A CNN headline later that year criticizing then-FDA commissioner Steven Hahn blared, “Past vaccine disasters show why rushing a coronavirus vaccine now would be ‘colossally stupid’”. Pointing out that there have been “bad outcomes” when the vaccine-making process was rushed, CNN provided a quartet of US incidents; the 1976 swine flu fiasco (which had been the last time the CDC rushed a pandemic flu shot), the Cutter incident, simian contamination in polio vaccines, as well as the anthrax vaccine that was forced upon soldiers.79 (The last time the WHO itself had rushed a pandemic vaccine was the 2009 Pandemrix disaster mentioned in a previous article.80) Accelerated drugs are a notoriously risky enterprise in general81, and the push to get a novel nucleotide chain, genetically modified to maximize expression,82,83 in a polyethylene glycol84 (petrochemical85) envelope designed to penetrate cellular membranes into billions of people is something for which the long-term ramifications remain unknown, and may never properly be, as the placebo groups were eli minated after mere months of trials.86 Moreover, such discovery is up against the notorious reluctance of regulators to implicate themselves87,88 for a set of uniquely novel vaccination products that were promoted as never before.89 The public was woefully uninformed of acute vulnerabilities such as during cell division.90, 91 In fact, the notion of risks was largely a priori dismissed, as the drugs were immediately universally advertised as “safe and effective.” Dissenters found it objectionable to take a new drug mechanism with no long-term testing and summarily market it to the public as “safe”. The pharmaceutical industrial complex whitewashed this lack of long-term testing by peddling the idea that the decades during which the products were routinely too dangerous to test on humans made them “well-researched”, thereby taking the time period during which the drugs were too hazardous for long-term data and absurdly using it as a promotional substitute for it. It was the most profoundly unscientific spin imaginable. “[Moderna] still does not have a single drug candidate in human clinical trials.” (Fortune Magazine, 2015)92 “It never proved safe enough to test in humans” (STAT, 2017)93 Lurking in the background, the companies that stood to gain the most from the frenzy, and would do so with record-breaking profits,94 were names like Pfizer, objectively the world’s largest criminal organization (having paid the world’s largest-ever criminal fine95), Moderna, which never brought a drug to market before relieved of the burden of durational safety testing,96 and AstraZeneca, a company that got the exclusive rights to its vaccine formula from Oxford, which had initially promised to donate the rights of its coronavirus vaccine with an “open license pledge.” This was abandoned after a meeting with WHO-megafunder Bill Gates in which he self-reportedly told them, “you really need to team up.”97,98 from --- Sources/Links: 1 https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2020-DON229 2 https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045#r1 3 http://web.archive.org/web/20211129005253/https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ 4 https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/28-01-2020-who-china-leaders-discuss-next-steps-in-battle-against-coronavirus-outbreak 5 https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus- (2019-ncov) 6 https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/how-china-blocked-who-chinese-scientists-early-coronavirus-outbreak-n1222246 7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK349040/ 8 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSaqOHypxTI 9 https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus- (2019-ncov) 10 https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/coronavirus-residents-welded-inside-their-own-home/ 11 https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1703503427818 12 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P0Q0NhfQoG4 13 https://www.city-journal.org/article/lockdowns-the-self-inflicted-disaster 14 https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/150-million-additional-children-plunged-poverty-due-covid-19-unicef-save-children 15 https://www.timesofisrael.com/virus-linked-hunger-tied-to-10000-child-deaths-each-month/ 16 https://www.unicef.org/rosa/media/13066/file/Main%20Report.pdf 17 https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2020/in-the-time-of-covid-19-why-have-we-not-declared-a-tuberculosis-pandemic/ 18 https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/mar/19/fight-against-tuberculosis-set-back-12-years-by-covid-pandemic-report-finds 19 https://www.scidev.net/global/news/renewed-malaria-push-needed-after-covid-19-setback/ 20 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9335023/ 21 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736 (20)32112-7/fulltext 22 https://www.wvi.org/newsroom/it-takes-world/child-marriage-has-more-doubled-during-covid-19-pandemic-numbers-set 23 https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/05/26/covid-19-pandemic-fueling-child-labor 24 https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/08/16/study-finds-lockdowns-cost-20-x-lives-they-claimed-to-save/ 25 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9368251/#:~:text=III.,on%20COVID%2D19%20mortality”. 26 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.625778/full 27 https://www.city-journal.org/article/lockdowns-the-self-inflicted-disaster 28 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33718322/ 29 https://www.nber.org/papers/w30104 30 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/10/opinion/covid-death-young-old.html 31 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/18/opinion/masks-schools-covid.html 32 https://www.edweek.org/leadership/two-decades-of-progress-nearly-gone-national-math-reading-scores-hit-historic-lows/2022/10 33 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/01/us/national-test-scores-math-reading-pandemic.html 34 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/su/su7103a5.htm?s_cid=su7103a5_w 35 https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/may/22/record-420000-children-in-england-treated-for-mental-health-problems 36 https://fee.org/articles/cdc-reports-51-increase-in-suicide-attempts-among-teenage-girls/ 37 https://www.nichd.nih.gov/newsroom/news/042722-COVID-adolescent-suicide 38 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2022/20220930.htm 39 https://www.city-journal.org/article/lockdowns-the-self-inflicted-disaster 40 https://acoem.org/Publications/Press-Releases/Pandemic-Lockdowns-Didn-t-Lower-Mortality—But-Did-Reduce-Employment 41 https://denisrancourt.ca/entries.php?id=115&name=2022_07_09_evaluating_the_effect_of_lockdowns_on_all_cause_mortality_during_the_covid_era_lockdowns_did_not_save_lives 42 https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf 43 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/04/briefing/american-children-crisis-pandemic.html 44 https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m3880 45 https://gbdeclaration.org/view-signatures/ 46 https://gbdeclaration.org 47 https://www.independent.org/news/article.asp?id=14366 48 https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/10/12/why-has-google-censored-the-great-barrington-declaration/ 49 https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/coronavirus-google-censorship-danger 50 https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus- (2019-ncov) 51 https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2020/10/23/we-need-to-work-together-to-tackle-the-coronavirus-infodemic/ 52 https://fee.org/articles/youtube-to-ban-content-that-contradicts-who-on-covid-19-despite-the-un-agency-s-catastrophic-track-record-of-misinformation/ 53 https://www.who.int/teams/digital-health-and-innovation/digital-channels/combatting-misinformation-online 54 https://www.wsj.com/articles/white-house-covid-censorship-machine-social-media-facebook-meta-executive-rob-flaherty-free-speech-google-11673203704 55 https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-stanford-partnered-with-twitter-biden-admin-to-censor-stories-of-true-vaccine-side-effects-twitter-files 56 https://fee.org/articles/the-government-s-sprawling-effort-to-censor-true-information-during-the-pandemic 57 https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635/rr-80 58 https://reclaimthenet.org/instagram-blocks-results-for-natural-immunity-hashtag/ 59 https://web.archive.org/web/20201101161006/https:/www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-serology 60 https://web.archive.org/web/20201223100930/https:/www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19 61 https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/226/2/195/6561438? 62 https://www.abc.net.au/news/health/2020-04-17/coronavirus-vaccine-ian-frazer/12146616 63 https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4037 64 https://www.fda.gov/media/144859/download 65 https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19#:~:text=At%20this%20time%2C%20data%20are,2%20from%20person%20to%20person. 66 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnxlxzxoZx0 67 https://www.who.int/news-room/commentaries/detail/immunity-passports-in-the-context-of-covid-19 68 https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/estonia-and-who-to-jointly-develop-digital-vaccine-certificate-to-strengthen-covax 69 https://www.ft.com/content/13ddacc4-0ae4-4be1-95c5-1a32ab15956a 70 https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/18/world/middleeast/israel-virus-infections-booster.html 71 http://web.archive.org/web/20211026172921/https://www.icelandreview.com/ask-ir/why-has-vaccination-not-led-to-herd-immunity-in-iceland-what-is-icelands-strategy-for-tackling-covid-now/ 72 http://web.archive.org/web/20221207143410/https://www.icelandreview.com/society/breaking-domestic-restrictions-reimposed-in-iceland/ 73 http://web.archive.org/web/20221207143410/https://www.icelandreview.com/society/breaking-domestic-restrictions-reimposed-in-iceland/ 74 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7031e2.htm?s_cid=mm7031e2_w 75 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AYqTgtIgLA 76 https://www.foxnews.com/media/dr-deborah-birx-knew-covid-vaccines-not-protect-against-infection 77 https://nypost.com/2021/12/16/biden-says-unvaxxed-will-overwhelm-hospitals-with-covid-cases/ 78 https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-statement-on-ihr-emergency-committee-on-novel-coronavirus- (2019-ncov) 79 https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/01/health/eua-coronavirus-vaccine-history/index.html 80 https://www.science.org/content/article/why-pandemic-flu-shot-caused-narcolepsy 81 https://www.propublica.org/article/fda-repays-industry-by-rushing-risky-drugs-to-market 82 https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF 83 https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/stabilising-the-code 84 https://www.science.org/content/article/suspicions-grow-nanoparticles-pfizer-s-covid-19-vaccine-trigger-rare-allergic-reactions 85 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyethylene_glycol 86 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccines-hurt-by-placebo-recipients-getting-immuni 87 https://www.amazon.com/Deadly-Medicines-Organised-Crime-Healthcare/dp/1846198844/ref=sr_1_1?crid=FAKESACU8QQ2&keywords=deadly+medicines+and+organised+crime&qid=1688620785&sprefix=deadly+medici%2Caps%2C191&sr=8-1 88 https://www.amazon.com/Truth-About-Drug-Companies-Deceive-ebook/dp/B000FC1V1A/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2PJTFYURZRH1F&keywords=the+truth+about+the+drug+companies+marcia+angell&qid=1688620804&sprefix=the+truth+about+the+drug+c%2Caps%2C139&sr=8-1 89 https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0407-covid-19-vaccine-programs.html 90 https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73 91 https://biomedres.us/pdfs/BJSTR.MS.ID.005501.pdf 92 https://fortune.com/2015/01/08/the-3-billion-startup-that-wants-to-help-you-to-make-medicines-in-your-own-cells/ 93 https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/ 94 https://www.npr.org/2021/11/24/1059041725/covid-vaccines-are-set-to-be-among-the-most-lucrative-pharmaceutical-products-ev 95 https://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/03/business/03health.html#:~:text=WASHINGTON%20—%20The%20pharmaceutical%20giant%20Pfizer,fine%20of%20any%20kind%20ever. 96 https://fortune.com/2020/11/19/moderna-vaccine-distribution-lonza-swiss/ 97 https://health.wusf.usf.edu/health-news-florida/2020-08-25/rather-than-give-away-its-covid-vaccine-oxford-makes-deal-with-drugmaker 98 https://kffhealthnews.org/news/rather-than-give-away-its-covid-vaccine-oxford-makes-a-deal-with-drugm

Are 11 Million Brazillians wrong? Discover Flat Earth

Finding our own meaning in a meaningless Universe

The origin of NASA and what they really are..

Science has stolen our common Sense. We are not what we know but what we are willing to learn.

The Cosmic False Flag

Time Travel, Space Cameras vs the Lucrative Flat Earth Nazi Cult

CERN scientist reveals they captured a MYSTERIOUS entity inside the particle collider

WHO Director General Tedros declares the collapse of the Pandemic Treaty

Why did Team Argentina fly to and stop in ROME on their way home to Buenos Aires? Why didn't they fly directly to Argentina? Because that's impossible - - on a GLOBE

Who is the real enemy?